OpEd: Discussing Microsoft, Sony And Slimmer Consoles

With Sony stealing all the headlines regarding the fact they were shrinking that monstrosity of a system called PLAYSTATION 3, my first thought was that Microsoft finally had a contender.  However the folks behind the Xbox 360 aren’t laying down at all.

Microsoft’s first real statement on the matter came to the good folks over at Arcs Technica when they asked for Microsoft’s thoughts on the PlayStation’s latest price reduction. They received a surprising response.

“A smaller console size does not necessarily mean more value for consumers. Starting at $199, Xbox 360 offers the best gaming and entertainment experience at the most consumer-friendly price on the market.”

Is it me or does this statement come out as just a little defensive for Microsoft?  Standard PR speak aside Microsoft is clearly sitting up and taking notice of Sony’s actions, and apparently rumor has it that Microsoft is considering killing off their Pro model and replacing it with a micro version of their own.  Fuel added to this theoretical fire comes from Microsoft’s recently announced price drops.  Just this week, in responding to Sony’s recent cuts, they have effectively reduced the Elite edition to $299, with the soon to be discontinued Pro model going for $250.

But would they release a ‘slim’ version like Sony has? Actually a better question to ask is what would drive such a model to market as historically Microsoft have never released such a revision for the Xbox line of consoles thus far.  Take Microsoft’s original comment to Arcs Technica in a new context, in that a new model might not be about size at all as like the ladies tell me all the time, size really isn’t all that important as opposed to the experience.  Of course this is reinforced by the fact that earlier in the week that Microsoft have no plans to release a ‘slim’ model.

So whilst a slim model looks rather unlikely, what about upgrading the Xbox 360 instead?  PC gamers can play games at different qualities based upon their system specifications, so is an upgraded ‘Xbox 540′ that hard to imagine?  A new model 360 with improved graphic capabilities and updated speed wouldn’t be considered innovative for the industry as the PlayStation 2 saw half a dozen small revisions, improved hardware and speed, Saying that, there were some titles which released later in the PS2 life cycle which were unreadable for the early adopters due to the nature of the dual-layer discs being used, those games being Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and Gran Turismo 4.  We’ve never seen a true generation bending console, in that a one has never been successfully upgraded to tackle new challenges and new ideas in ways that were previously impossible.  Adding credence to this, a rumor in late 2008 surfaced that claimed that the third generation Xbox console would only be an enhanced existing model. Furthermore Electronic Arts‘ Creative Chief Rich Hilleman hinted at this very possibility earlier this week when he stated the following,

“I expected we’ll see a PlayStation 3.5 before we see a PlayStation 4 and an Xbox 560 before we see an Xbox 720.”

But would an interim hardware upgrade alone be enough to drive a new console model?  There is a good chance that Microsoft has something up its sleeve that almost assuredly will bring new hardware. How about Project Natal?

project-natal-briefing

Unless you’re completely green to the gaming world, you’ll have to realize that Project Natal is a potential game changer not just for Microsoft, but for the whole industry.  Nintendo changed the mold of gaming with the Wii when suddenly you weren’t stuck in a world ruled by your thumbs, your very physical movements were being reflected in the game.  This paradigm shift resulted in millions of new ‘casual’ gamers, and gave Nintendo a huge leg up on winning the sixth generation console war.  Now with Nintendo leading the pack, Sony plans to follow up with their own motion controls, yet Microsoft’s full feedback video response system hopes to trump them all.  Due to the hardware being able to track forty-eight points of the human body, of up to six players on the fly, Natal was awarded an E3 Best of Show award.

So how does this back the idea of a new model of Xbox 360? Because we’ve already heard this rumor before from Microsoft’s vice president Shane Kim regarding Natal:

“(It’s) similar to how you would think of the launch of a new console. It’s got to have a great launch line-up. That’s the same thing here.”

A playful little slip of the tongue? What better way to launch a console sized product then with… a new console! Heck, even Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft had a much publicized, and later retracted, statement that claimed Natal was Microsoft’s next console.

So when might we be seeing the much talked about couple bundled together?  Well the ideal time would have to be the upcoming holiday season, the time of the year when the industry sees it’s biggest sales numbers.  The fact that Microsoft has remained quiet on the issue of a release date suggests hesitancy;  they don’t want to rush Natal, thus are unsure that they’ll make such a date.  Most experts are inclined to believe an early 2010 release is most likely, yet I’m inclined to go against the trend.  Even a December release for the highly touted Natal would be an instant Christmas hit, and would assuredly sell out.  Sales aside, it would carry a healthy buzz well into the 2010 year for Microsoft to lead with.

But as I said, it all comes down to timing.  Indicating that they do not wish to rush Natal out the door, Microsoft want to get this right the first time where Nintendo had to follow up with MotionPlus.  But if Natal will not be ready for 2009, does this mean an upgraded Xbox might be released independently this year?

It would be foolhardy to think Microsoft would release a new Xbox 360 model mere months before they would release yet another ‘Natal-ized 360′.   But even more fundamentally, given the current economic state will gamers buy an upgraded model at all?  If Microsoft creates a hardware divide among its established base, the potential backlash from loyal early adopters could be costly.  History has taught us that typically after a system has been released, those specs aren’t for changing, regardless of desire to do otherwise such as when SEGA touted the 32x addon for the Sega Genesis.  The device was so popular that it exceeded sales predictions with regards to preorders, although with a rushed product, limited resources and high price put paid to any plans SEGA had to extend the life of Genesis.  In the end it only ended up selling around 200,000 units, so how will Microsoft be able to convince the crowd that Natal will not only work, but work well.

Price drops, rumors of a slimmer form factor, and incoming hardware upgrades.  These are just classic business signs that Microsoft is getting ready to release something big, and soon.  Quietly reducing your current stock of existing hardware with price cuts and promotions is the norm of the tech industry when you’re getting set to push out something large; in other words, out with the old before the public sees the new.  While Microsoft is rather notorious with their release of new models, it all seems to be coming together like two trains on the same track.  The looming release of Natal with the projection of a newer, cheaper and potentially slimmer system.

Photo credit: gamerlimit.com

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Comments

3 Responses to “OpEd: Discussing Microsoft, Sony And Slimmer Consoles”
  1. name says:

    just had to say one thing.
    that “hes steve ballmer professional” if meant as sarcasm ok, but MS dont know the word professional.
    its not in their dictionary, childish, immature,completely up themselves yes, but they couldn’t be further from professional.
    their pathetic jab at the wii at E3 is a perfect example of this.
    “no pre waggled commands” or something like that.
    thats typical MS always bagging the competition instead of explaining why there better.
    MS should go into politics they would suit that perfectly.
    there full of tripe, there completely up themselves, and they think they own the world, thats the perfect job for them.
    o and they think their above the law, which sadly seems to be true, if any other company made a console with a 54% failure rate they would of been sued so many times they would be bankrupt by now.

  2. A CEO of one of the worlds most recognised, and largest, corporations with his tongue sticking out like a grotesque, obese child…and you thought that image was intended to be serious???

    All companies talk smack, in fact Sony were doing something similar with their Wand technology. Don’t take it personally as in ten years we can all look back at this and have a good chuckle at the failed empty promises whilst we sit in a nuclear bunker, with only a Colecovision amongst us to keep us sane.

  3. Eron says:

    Not bad. A few things to note.

    1) ALWAYS cite your photos, lest you find a lovely little letter from Gamer Informer in your Inbox one day. ;)

    2) Drive your article with something other than questions, especially if the tone of the question is rhetorical… even more so if you plan to answer your own rhetorical questions…. Which you shouldn’t.

    3) I’m not sure these signs you mention are classic of a “big release.” Keep in mind that stocks (regardless of the performance of the company) reflect current marketing conditions for the stocks themselves. I doubt there is a large market of people looking to invest in luxury stocks (i.e. video games) during a recession.

    4) Explore how revised editions of consoles can drop manufacturing costs. EG The new ps3 edition has push buttons instead of digital sensors for ejecting and power on/off. Do new editions of consoles stand to increase profit margins by removing “tricked out” pieces in favor of more modestly priced and easier to manufacture console parts? Or are these changes lost in new specs such as increased hard drive.
    In short if you’re going to get into market analysis, analyze “the market” (and all its sub-prime factors) and not your article’s view on the topic.

    5) Keep using aggressive wording and strong language. It leads the reader to the next sentence whether they want to go there or not.

    6) I’m a total jerk because I commented about your style rather than your article.

Discuss: